April 2004 Cover
|
 |
After a 22-year-old woman in El Monte, California reported that a sheriff's deputy raped her, the sheriff's Internal Criminal Investigation Bureau confiscated the deputy's underpants.
The Daily Breeze, which reported the alleged rape, did not make clear exactly how the underpants could be used to develop evidence. Sniffing them and licking them would give a
great deal of secret information about the man, but it would all be irrelevant, incompetent, and immaterial to investigators. I doubt that the sheriff's investigators could distinguish clearly
the flavors and fragrances of piss, cum, saliva, sweat, and pussy sauce.
Nor did the paper say whether the deputy wore bikinis, jockey shorts, or boxers.
He is accused of "forcible rape and forcible oral copulation." This suggests that he fucked her mouth.
If he has a juicy dick, the fly of his underpants might well contain an encrusted deposit of his cum; but the deputy could, if he wanted, account for this by claiming that he had beat
his meat and after he shot his wad and put on his underpants a few drops of cock juice seeped out of his piss-hole.
The rape allegedly took place on the back seat of the deputy's patrol car. The paper does not specify whether he took off his pants and shorts or merely lowered them.
I hope that the apparatus who sent the clipping will keep us informed about the analysis of the deputy's lingerie.
You are not logged in.
No comments yet, but
click here to be the first to comment on this
Sex Histories!
|
